Mind & Body Tools to Optimize Your Life
Why Binaural Beats don’t Work as Well as These Alternatives
Binaural beats are a popular way of training your brain to produce brainwaves of a certain frequency.
- 1 Each frequency comes with its own “brain state”
- 2 Brainwave entrainment by binaural beats
- 3 But how effective are binaural beats really?
- 4 Maybe a slight entrainment effect from binaural beats?
- 5 Binaural beats don’t work as well as these alternatives
- 6 So why do many people still insist on using binaural beats?
- 7 Conclusion: throw away all your binaural beats tracks?
Each frequency comes with its own “brain state”
For example: if you stimulate your brain with “alpha waves” (frequencies between 8 and 12 hz), the result would be that you feel more relaxed and less anxious/stressed.
And if you present your brain with frequencies in the “theta” range, you might experience drowsiness and sleepiness.
The brainwaves and their accompanying states:
Brainwave entrainment by binaural beats
The tendency of the brain to “fall in step” with a presented stimulus is called “entrainment”. And binaural beats are by far the most popular way to “entrain” the brain. There are a lot of binaural beat cd’s and tracks being sold on the internet (and sometimes at a high price!).
How are binaural beats produced?
Binaural beats are created by presenting two different tones at slightly different pitches (or frequencies) separately into each ear. The effect of a third frequency is produced within your brain itself.
This picture explains:
But how effective are binaural beats really?
This article by Dave Siever from MindAlive.com (a producer of “Audio-Visual Entrainment machines”) claims that binaural beats don’t work as well as people seem to think:
“Binaural beats are not very noticeable because the modulation depth (the difference between loud and quiet) is 3 db, a two-to-one ratio. … This means that binaural beats are unlikely to produce any significant entrainment because they don’t activate the thalamus.”
To compare: isochronic tones and monaural beats have a 50 db difference between loud and quiet. Which is a 100,000-to-1 ratio.
“If, in theory binaural beats do not produce entrainment, do they produce entrainment and drive brainwaves in reality? The simple answer is NO!”
He also cites studies that clearly show the little entrainment binaural beats provide to the brain. His conclusion:
“Binaural beats cannot generate entrainment because, as two steady tones, they do NOT impact the thalamus.”
My own experience
In my own experience, binaural beats did produce an effect. In my early twenties I was a bad sleeper and with the help of a binaural beat cd, I learned how to sleep deeper during the night. I also taught myself to have naps during the day (something which was next to impossible for my nervous personality back then!).
And some 10 years after that, that same cd erased my partner’s regular trouble to fall asleep at night.
Ok, not scientific proof as such: it might be a placebo effect at work, or just the fact of taking time out to relax and listen to the cd helped a lot. But fact is: my partner and I greatly benefited from it.
And not just us, many other people around the globe have had similar successes. One proof of that statement is the amount of testimonials of “The Gateway Program”.
The Gateway Program
The Monroe Institute’s Gateway Program is a 6 day course in which “hemi-sync” tapes are used to induce meditative states and altered states of consciousness in participants.
(Hemi sync is exactly the same technology as binaural beats, it’s just the proprietary name for the in-house produced tapes and cd’s at the Monroe Institute.)
The Gateway Program has, over the years (since the seventies), helped numerous people reach different levels of human consciousness, including states in which they claim to have experienced out-of-body experiences, visited other “reality systems” or had “contact with deceased family members”.
Watch a short intro to the gateway program and people’s experiences with hemi-sync:
Maybe a slight entrainment effect from binaural beats?
Personally, I have no doubt that at least some entrainment is produced with binaural beats technology (such as hemi sync).
Actually, in his article, Dave Siever doesn’t totally close the door to possible entrainment effects from binaural beats. After looking at the research, he admits that some entrainment effects were observed in some cases:
“The study by Lane, however, indicated that during beta frequency binaural stimulation, participants performed better than during theta stimulation.”
“The study by Le Scouarnec suggested a reduction in anxiety with theta binaural beats.”
The conclusion is that studies examining binaural beat entrainment have yielded inconsistent results.
- Some (Schwarz & Taylor, Karino et al, Brady & Stevens) have reported increases in spectral density at the theta frequency.
- On the other hand, this study (Stevens et al, 2003) has failed to find evidence of entrainment:
‘results were not supportive of the specific efficacy of the theta binaural beat training employed in this study in either increasing frontal theta EEG activity or in increasing hypnotic susceptibility.
Statistical power analyses indicated the theta binaural beat training to be a very low power phenomenon on theta EEG activity. ‘
- The Wahbeh et al study showed contradictory results. They did find a mild increase in depression and reduced verbal memory after theta stimulation. But this is the conclusion of the study, quoting directly from PubMed:
There were no significant differences between the experimental and control conditions in any of the EEG measures. There was an increase of the Profile of Mood States depression subscale in the experimental condition relative to the control condition (p = 0.02). There was also a significant decrease in immediate verbal memory recall (p = 0.03) in the experimental condition compared to control condition.
We did not find support for steady-state entrainment of the scalp-recorded EEG while listening to 7-Hz binaural beats. Although our data indicated increased depression and poorer immediate recall after listening to binaural beats, larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
- This study by Goodin et al from 2012 also showed no results. But if I read that article correctly it looks like they have exposed the participating subjects to binaural beats for only 2 minutes, which I always believed to be too short to produce any entrainment.
Binaural beats don’t work as well as these alternatives
But the point that Dave Siever is making is that, of the three auditory ways to entrain the brain:
- binaural beats
- monaural beats
- isochronic tones
…binaural beats are the least effective of all.
Monaural beats are actually more effective than binaural beats.
“Monaural beats, however, do impact the thalamus, and therefore the cortex, because they are in beat form before they strike the ear drum.”
Monaural beats, or monaural tones, are produced by mixing two tones of different frequencies, but (contrary to binaural beats) this occurs outside of the ears.
(It happens in the air when played through loudspeakers, or it takes place in the mixing device that sends the sound through the headphones to the ears.)
By the way, binaural beats played through loudspeakers become monaural beats!
Monaural beats are an effective way of producing entrainment. Siever:
“EEG studies of monaural beats have conclusively shown that monaural beats produce a frequency following response in the contralateral hemisphere of the brain, and therefore are entraining.”
The third form of auditory entrainment are isochronic tones. Said to be the most effective type of auditory brainwave entrainment, because of the distinct “on and off” impulses they provide to the human ear.
What they are (from wikipedia):
Isochronic tones are regular beats of a single tone. An isochronic tone is a tone that is being turned on and off rapidly. They create sharp, distinctive pulses of sound. The volume or intensity of the sound goes almost directly from 0 to 100 and back again in an evenly-spaced manner. They differ from monaural beats, which are constant sine wave pulses rather than entirely separate pulses of a single tone.
The difference with monaural tones is that isochronic tones are rather sharp tones. Monaural beats turn on and off more gently and therefore are smoother beats. Some people can find the isochronic pulse tones too stimulating.
Note: the most efficient form of entrainment is actually not auditory, but visual.
On a study done in 1999 by Frederick, Lubar, Rasey, Brim, & Blackburn, David Siever commented:
When comparing flashing light with evenly spaced auditory tone pulses (isochronic tones), it was found that with:
a) eyes-closed 18.5 Hz. photic entrainment increased 18.5 Hz EEG activity by 49%;
b) eyes-open auditory entrainment produced increased 18.5 Hz. EEG activity by 27%;
c) eyes-closed auditory entrainment produced increased 18.5 Hz EEG activity by 21%.
“auditory entrainment from isochronic tones produces about half of the entrainment effects as compared to flashing light.”
So, what if you could have both, auditory and visual? That’s exactly what mind machines do. The unique combination of both these entrainmant modalities make them probably the most efficient tool on the market today for brainwave entrainment.
So why do many people still insist on using binaural beats?
I don’t know. Maybe because they’re the easiest to find on the market?
Personally, I still use them too. At some times I like them more because they’re “gentler” and not as invasive as the isochronic tones. They can be more pleasant to listen to.
One benefit that binaural beats do have over the other forms of entrainment is: they produce better hemispherical synchronization (meaning: they help the two sides of the brain work together more harmoniously). Both sides of the brain have to work together to produce the sound you hear.
Also interesting to note
Dave Siever’s newest devices also have, besides the standard isochronic tones and light pulses they provide, the possibility to include monaural as well as binaural beats into the mix that reaches your ears. So he must think these binaural beats have at least some efficiency.
Conclusion: throw away all your binaural beats tracks?
That won’t be needed.
But the advice I do take from this research is to play any binaural beats through loudspeakers. In that way you’re effectively transforming them into monaural beats, which are far more effective.
sources: all quotes by Dave Siever
[…] http://www.livingflow.net/why-binaural-beats-dont-work-as-well-as-these-alternatives/ […]
This phenomenon was thoroughly researched and tested in 1973 by biophysicist Gerald Oster at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. His research on binaural beats and the Frequency Following Response was published in Scientific American and paved the way for further development in the area of auditory stimulation to enhance brain functioning.
There is no author, nor any citation equipment available, how reliable can this source be. If the author could please update with credit to themselves, that would be lovely for anyone trying to use this as a source.
Euh… the article talks about “Dave Siever”, and about many studies done, like Frederick, Lubar, Rasey, Brim, & Blackburn (1999), Stevens et al, (2003), Goodin et al from 2012, and more. Please read the article again.
Dave Siever is an ignorant jerk if he says binaural beats are a scam. A pseudo-expert who believes his own B*S* over decades of valid SCIENTIFIC research, with results from decreased learning time, heightened serotonin and lowered cortisol, to increased reaction time, lowered BP and enhanced memory.
I have a saying: “beware the science from people who are trying to sell you something.”
Seems to have hit a nerve.
But I guess Sievers is entitled to his opinion. He even states it without swearing.
Also, are you not in the same boat, mixing science and selling?
Ah, you know, opinions differ. And how can we ever know something 100% for sure anyway? So I wouldn’t sweat it.
[…] Read More: livingflow.net/binaural-beats-don-t-work-as-well-as-these-alternatives/ […]
binural beats do actually help…actually all 3 have their positives, please don’t bash one over another, thanks 🙂
I didn’t notice any bashing… I believe BB have an effect.
Here’s Seivers research:
Thanks. That’s the pdf version of the article I’m linking to in my post.
During a video on YouTube Seivers stated the only reason they include binaural beats in the ‘Delight’ machines is they had to for marketing – he said binaural beats don’t do anything…
Binaural Beats work better for me, especially Gamma Waves. Isochronic beeping seems to annoy me, I can’t listen to it for more than 10 minutes.
[…] however binaural beats are the most popular and readily available methods of brainwave entrainment. One user of binaural beats says, “I don’t know. Maybe because they’re the easiest to find on the […]
In his Saybrook University course on stim technologies, Dave refers to binaural beats as a quote-unquote “scam.” The biggest scam on the internet or something to that effect.
the biggest scam on the internet – hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah – ok! shift focus is all you need … focus not on the big noise but the softer in between noise – because people don’t do that, people don’t get the effect